Introduction to the Soldier Training Model for Soldier Specialties

Reading Time: 3 minutes

This soldier training model for specific jobs is geared to find out exactly what requirements a person assigned to them will need to be trained to fulfill in order to carry out the specificities of their particular job. There are many resources online for finding military related training information and publications. Any leader, commander, trainer and soldier alike can use this training model as a way to design a scheme, to execute that scheme and to assess training tasks assigned to individual soldiers on a unit based level. Typically, the training models and reference guides listed here can be a major source of information on the development of soldier training regimens in a unit. It can be used in conjunction with a variety of other tools and resources to jointly plan an effective training model that is specific to the tasks typically performed in a particular job. These models also follow doctrinal standards used by many armed forces around the world. These guidelines are meant to be just that – guidelines – and can be tweaked to meet the specific requirements and purposes for individual training regimens being devised by commanders and unit trainers.

Any soldier and their leader needs to undergo a thorough training regimen in order to effectively execute tasks that lead to a victory for their side. They need to be ready at a moment’s notice to react and eliminate threats to the
well being, stability, peace and sovereignty of whatever they are safeguarding. With the chaos of battle, one cannot always attribute a victory to pure luck or happenstance, it is usually directly tied to the prior thorough training and examination of soldiers that puts them in realistic scenarios, and this training kicks in to provide light in an otherwise unfamiliar spectrum of experiences that most human beings no longer have to endure in our civilized society.

These training regimens must be geared to incorporate several layers of training content, and to be able to operate jointly with other specific roles in order to functionally perform collective tasks. These combinations might include working with other agencies, units, soldiers, specialties, organizational types and could potentially operate in a wide range of environments and terrains. Unit trainers and commanders should take all of these possibilities into considerations based on their briefings in order to design the training program to cater to any specific considerations that are to be expected.

There are missions the military typically conducts that are not just the waging of war against armed groups or nations, but also those that are considered military operations yet do not involve carrying out warlike operations. They range from large scale armed engagements to smaller scale skirmishes and armed scenarios for which a plan to contain the
situation has been devised and it’s outcome is more manageable and predictable, or even potential outbreaks of violence during peacetime or acting to eliminate a threats arising out of unexpected circumstances. Some operation types might be for the purpose of supporting another agency, or for purposes of humanitarian aid and stabilization of regions and zones. Commanders can train their units to be capable of synchronizing between warlike operations and either conduct non-war military operations in parallel, or one type of operation after another that are usually interlinked in their nature and necessary to do step by step in order to achieve a certain total outcome. In order to be safe, commanders should devise their soldier’s training regimens to be geared for a combination of both war and non-war operations as the need for such operations often occur together. The sheer amount of potential objectives and tasks can make it difficult for commanders to devise training systems that focus on all needed particular training requirements for soldiers to be able to adapt in all situations and operational environments. The basic training regimen for a warrior organization should be first and foremost geared towards combat efficiency, and then all other specific scenarios can later be incorporated into the regimen as the need arises.